Well, maybe that's true, but also, when writers write they usually want to hear if the OP liked their fill...and I have the right, and probably the obligation, of delivering honest concrit. Maybe you're the kind of writer who prefers their reviewers delude them into thinking their writing/storybuilding is marvelous regardless of quality, but most writers are not like that, or at least that's my personal experience.

I think YOU showed an incredible rudeness and shocking presumption in assuming my motives and atittude. I took great care in being extremely polite in my review, actually praised the aspects I loved (writing, IC characterization) and delivered very respectful concrit on the rest. The main point of it, which you still seem to have missed, was that I found Alfred's hurting to be going against my prompt, since I wanted him to remain clueless. But as I told the authoranon, I really want to see the rest, and now realise I spoke too early about my impressions.

Maybe you should check the way you address others, since this is making me and possibly others, not want to leave thought-out sincere reviews and stick to "Yay so awesome please continue!", which isn't problematic and takes much less effort. The levels of butthurt around here are discouraging. Also, let me remark that the writer was much more polite and made me see the errors of my review much more than your rude comment did.